Steroids For Sale

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Primobolan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Primobolan

    We need to nail a few facts down here to ease my mind, as well as the vast majority of us, as I know most of us want to try Primo. I have read our profile on it so many times, and it is one of the only AAS that I feel I will ever want to use once I try it. I hear nothing but good about it, and the only negative I hear is from people who haven't ran it long enough or high enough. I feel that 750-1000mgs for men is about par for the course, but if it is accurately dosed, 500mgs could have a decent effect. I have been researching this compound so much that I really want to give it a go. Of course the price is the only downside (other than literally being a pin cushion).

    I just found a write up on it in a thread that sort of blew me away. Basically said that it is about the only injectable AAS that will add permanent mass, even while on a caloric deficit. I can post it if it is allowed. Anyways, it said it takes a long time for the effects to start to show, but when they do, the gains are some of the most impressive of them all. Apparently it even takes longer than deca to start to show up. It also doesn't have any negative sides on BP, nor is lipids a major concern. Many people who can afford it will run it indefinitely, for months on end.

    Some of the questions that I have are simple, but views differ from person to person. I truly feel that 750-1000+ is appropriate for men, while up to 100mgs is ideal for a woman. Some say as little as 500mgs is fine, but the vast majority says anything less that 750 is a waste. So whats true? I want to brew it at 200mgs/ml, but from what I gather, even though it can be done, Primobolan is an irritant and if dosed that high can leave some serious pain and possible crashing in the muscle itself. No doubt I can get it to hold that high, but I am unsure of the pain involved. It would make dosing it so much easier, especially if ran for 16+weeks, and I want to run it for 20+, and even up to 24 weeks. I just don't want to pin ED or EOD for that long by any means. SO if anyone has a pain free 200mg/ml recipe, please PM it my way! Lol. Serious.

    And for now, the last thing I will bring up is what I might consider at the front end to wait out the "kick in" for the primo. My intentions have been all year to use a test/deca cycle through the winter at 1000/1000mgs, no less than 750/750. Now after really wanting to try the primo, I am starting to wonder and want some more ideas. Ive thought about keeping testosterone pretty high (750-1000mgs) and use NPP for the first 6 weeks, then hope that the primo kicks in by then. And yes, I am using this as a "bulking" cycle, and yes, using primo! Primo and deca are very similar in what they do, but the end result with primo is not even comparable. 0 bloat and no prolactin or estrogen sides. And if I did use primo, Id lower the test about 10-12 weeks in to a trt dose and finish the primo cycle with some mast/var and a low tren dose.

    Primobolan is just a very exciting compound that really has me fired up. I couldn't imagine how well a primo/mast/tren/var cycle would be for someone who is already lean, yet has a decent amount of mass. I recommend everyone here read the profiles that Dan C has written on these compounds. Amazing stuff and the effort put into them should not be ignored. Think about this weekly cycle:

    Testosterone @100mgs/Primo @ 1000mgs/Tren @ 300mgs/Mast @ 500mgs/Var @ 700mgs/T3 @ 100mcgs ED!

    I know that is a lot of compounds at one time. And I also understand this is in no way a cycle any beginner should even consider. But for someone who charts and documents their daily intake of supps and nutrients, and has a firm grasp on what each of these compounds are intended for and the side effects to watch for, this would be insane! A cycle like this should include BW throughout, as well as a prostate check towards the end. That is a lot of DHT and all safety precautions should be taken. This cycle may be too intense/extreme for even the most seasoned AAS user. Just dreaming over here, lol!

  • #2
    Yes, Primobolan needs to be run for longer cycles and it needs to be run at a high dose. It is a VERY weak anabolic. If you're looking for GAINS from it, yes, very high dose (1,000mg/week minimum) and long cycles are a must with Primobolan. For those looking to merely preserve muscle mass during a cut and to help a caloric deficit along, 400mg/week will do. I would say in terms of muscle gains, it is almost like HGH in that it takes a while for it to show, but it is long, slow, steady, and quality. The big drawback with an anabolic steroid like this that requires high doses if you're looking for gains is simply the fact that it is very expensive. And so when it comes to an anabolic steroid like that... I am much more likely to recommend low dose Trenbolone or something.
    Chief writer for Steroidal.com
    Formerly known as Atomini
    Steroidal.com: the world's largest informational resource on anabolic steroids and all things performance enhancing drug related!
    "Strongest minds are often those whom the noisy world hears least" - William Wordsworth

    Comment


    • #3
      From personal experience, I can't justify its high price, no way.

      Comment


      • #4
        Great to know guys. Thanks a lot. It seems it is one of the only AASs that will add mass even on a caloric deficit, which would really help me due to work.I eat ok except at work in the heat. It is something I am seriously considering, but using a short ester like npp the first 6 weeks. Even then, from what I hear, it takes up to 12 weeks to notice with primo, but daily changes are common.

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm also thinking along these lines. I'd rather gain 15 solid and keepable pounds in a 20 week period than I would 30 pounds in a 10 week period, only to lose 70%. But once again, I've never used primobolan, and I might hate it. It sounds stunning from a lot of user experiences, but on paper it looks lame. I would love to know a painless 200mg/ml recipe however. I know I could get it to hold with a 50:50 EO/GSO mix with a highish BB%, but man I hate EO and BB! But its worth a shot. My wallet won't be the same after 20+ weeks of primo at close to a gram a week, but ill never really know without trying it for myself. I like the stack I provided earlier whoot whoot!

          Comment


          • #6
            Just thinking out loud here:
            Primo E, Mast E, Tren E, Anavar, test E
            Weekly doses in order of the list:
            750/500/250/700/100

            Take this out for 12-16 weeks

            That would be one of the best cut/recomp stacks of all time! WOW! Sometimes I amaze myself. Is it bad to say I had trouble sleeping last night thinking about this? It sad I know, but it really gets me excited! I actually lay in bed thinking about this crap, lol.

            Comment


            • #7
              I honestly would think that in a cycle like that, the Primobolan would be completely dwarfed and overshadowed by the other stronger compounds in the mix, namely the Trenbolone, Anavar, and Testosterone. It would feel to me that the addition of Primobolan into that would really be a waste of money.
              Chief writer for Steroidal.com
              Formerly known as Atomini
              Steroidal.com: the world's largest informational resource on anabolic steroids and all things performance enhancing drug related!
              "Strongest minds are often those whom the noisy world hears least" - William Wordsworth

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Dan C View Post
                I honestly would think that in a cycle like that, the Primobolan would be completely dwarfed and overshadowed by the other stronger compounds in the mix, namely the Trenbolone, Anavar, and Testosterone. It would feel to me that the addition of Primobolan into that would really be a waste of money.
                I agree.

                I noticed nothing from it at over 1,000mg/wk, but I'm not certain it actually was Primobolan in the end. If I used it again I'd go with Schering and nothing else.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Dan C View Post
                  I honestly would think that in a cycle like that, the Primobolan would be completely dwarfed and overshadowed by the other stronger compounds in the mix, namely the Trenbolone, Anavar, and Testosterone. It would feel to me that the addition of Primobolan into that would really be a waste of money.
                  I absolutely agree with you Dan. What I was thinking would be to have the primo as the primary, and then carry it on out several weeks longer than the others. This is all make believe, I just get abnormally excited about all things AAS (still waiting on the T3 profile btw) and planning out cycles, even if they are dumb and never used.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Admin View Post
                    I agree.

                    I noticed nothing from it at over 1,000mg/wk, but I'm not certain it actually was Primobolan in the end. If I used it again I'd go with Schering and nothing else.
                    Thats crazy! Nothing at over a gram would be aweful. And as often as primo is faked, it would probably be very difficult to even find a solid powder source, as l bet a lot of them also use a nandrolone powder as many finished sources do. That sucks. Schering gear is like finding the end of the rainbow for me. Not to mention what it would cost to run a gram a week for half a year! Whew.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by warmouth View Post
                      Thats crazy! Nothing at over a gram would be aweful. And as often as primo is faked, it would probably be very difficult to even find a solid powder source, as l bet a lot of them also use a nandrolone powder as many finished sources do. That sucks. Schering gear is like finding the end of the rainbow for me. Not to mention what it would cost to run a gram a week for half a year! Whew.
                      This is what I mean. Its probably best used by women at their lower dosages, not males IMO.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Admin View Post
                        This is what I mean. Its probably best used by women at their lower dosages, not males IMO.
                        Well Admin, you've given me something to think about. Dang I want to know legit from fake. The biggest draw for me is that supposedly it is not a calorie dependant AAS for adding mass, which is ideal for me in the summer months.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X